Why Isn't the Black Lightning TV Show Performing Better?

The Black Lightning TV show has faced persistent criticism for its perceived shortcomings, particularly when viewed through the lens of race and representation in the entertainment industry. Primarily, the show is often portrayed as lacking the expected flashy and dramatic action sequences that viewers might be accustomed to, and instead presents a dose of reality and even realism that some audiences find unsatisfying. This analysis delves into the factors behind the show's underperformance, touching on its unique narrative elements and the broader context of public reception.

The Reality vs. Expectations

One of the most common critiques of Black Lightning is that it often fails to meet the heightened expectations set by other superhero shows within the Arrowverse. The series is set in a much darker and more gritty environment, which some viewers find to be a realist approach. While this realism is an intentional artistic choice, it often clashes with the more fantastical and action-oriented moments in the series, particularly during action sequences.

Racial Issues in Media

The show's portrayal of a black superhero with a white support system, a black father with black daughters who also possess powers, and the complex relationship dynamics, have been met with varying degrees of reception. Critics argue that the show is too progressive in its representation, which can be interpreted as a reflection of the broader struggles within the entertainment industry when it comes to diversity and inclusivity.

Some viewers within a predominantly white audience find the show's progressive nature to be off-putting. The perception is that the show goes too far in terms of progressive politics, which may be seen as tailoring to a more liberal audience or failing to cater to a more conservative demographic. In many discussions, the show is often labeled as "Racist America" or "too liberal," suggesting a significant disconnect between the content and audience expectations.

Storylines and character development

Another critique centers around the show's narrative consistency. While the drama of the show is generally well-received, the integration of the action sequences and the overall story arc tend to fall short. The show often focuses on its character-driven narrative, which involves a lot of character growth and development, but the battles and action scenes sometimes feel flat and unbelievable. This is akin to the concern raised regarding the third season, which struggled with holding the narrative in place after the Tuskegee Experiment storyline, feeling like a repetitive and stagnant progression.

The third season, in particular, was criticized for not moving the story forward sufficiently. Some viewers felt that the show's decision to revisit well-trodden narrative territory without introducing new and compelling elements was a missed opportunity to elevate the series further. The insistence on maintaining realism and character-driven storytelling may have compromised the impact of the action sequences, as these moments often felt more theatrical and less grounded.

Conclusion

While Black Lightning has a solid foundation in its character development and drama, its underperformance can be attributed to a combination of factors, including audience expectations, the genre's shifting dynamics, and the desire for certain viewers to find a more traditional and action-oriented experience. Whether the show continues to evolve and find its niche, or if it will eventually fade in popularity, remains to be seen. However, the conversation around Black Lightning highlights the broader issues facing representations of race and diversity in media.

The reality is that Black Lightning offers a unique perspective that challenges conventional norms in superhero storytelling, but its path to success will depend on navigated balance between its core strengths and the evolving tastes of its audience.