Why I Avoid Watching News: Beyond Political Bias and Sensationalism

There are several reasons why I, and potentially many others, choose to avoid watching news. Often, the reason is more complex than just political bias. It involves a combination of fear, misinformation, and the misleading nature of sensational reporting.

The Dangers of Dwell Time

One of the primary reasons I avoid watching news is the phenomenon of "dwell time." Like Greta Thunberg, who could not stop dwelling on a video about climate change, I find myself engrossed in the negative stories presented. Recent research shows that people tend to dwell more on negative news than positive news due to survival instincts. This is a deeply ingrained human behavior that makes reading about tragedies or political scandals all the more consuming.

Media Bias and Sensationalism

News outlets, often overlooked for their sensationalist reporting, are driven by profit rather than public education. A study by the Pew Research Center found that while news platforms aim to inform the public, their primary goal is to attract readers and viewers. Sensationalism, the practice of making news more sensational and dramatic, is a common tactic to achieve this. For instance, news stories on "X may cause cancer" or "Council slams town centre proposal" are often oversimplified to fit a headline, leading to misinterpretation and misinformation.

Misinformation and the Deliberate Misguidance of the Public

A few examples illustrate the extent of the problem. For instance, the belief that 80% of Americans support abortion but only 22% would not comply if Roe v. Wade were overturned is highly misleading. Additionally, some argue that the Democrats have been fighting for women's rights, which is another myth. These statements pit groups against each other, spreading misinformation rather than fostering mutual understanding.

The Role of Headlines in the Battle of Perceptions

Headlines, which are often crafted to grab attention, play a crucial role in shaping public perception. They can be deliberately misleading. For example, "Outcry over bus timetable changes" might imply that there is widespread public opposition, but it could simply mean that a few people complained. Similarly, "Murder rate rising" is likely a misinterpretation of stagnant or declining statistics. To avoid falling for such traps, it’s essential to question and verify the content beyond the headlines.

Balancing Act: Information and Sensationalism

While it’s undeniable that some news outlets cater to sensationalism, it’s also crucial to recognize the informational value of staying informed. However, the proliferation of misinformation and the overwhelming focus on negative news can be overwhelming. Thus, finding the right balance between staying informed and avoiding the pitfalls of sensationalism is paramount. Additionally, consuming content from a variety of sources, including weekly/monthly magazines, podcasts, and documentaries, can help provide a more holistic and less sensational perspective.

Conclusion

In conclusion, avoiding news is not just about political bias; it’s about the overwhelming presence of sensationalism and misinformation. While staying well-informed is crucial, it’s equally important to approach news critically and seek out balanced, non-sensational sources. This way, we can make informed decisions without being misled by the tactics of media outlets.