Why Do People Judge Old Movies through Political Correctness?

It is widely recognized that as viewers grow older, they tend to become more sensitive to the political and social attitudes reflected in older films. The innocence of youth transitions into a more critical mindset, often leading to the perception that older movies are backward and flawed. This article explores this phenomenon and touches upon the reasons behind such judgments, including emotional maturity, historical knowledge, and the allure of purity movements.

Sensitivity to Politics in Old Films

For me, personally, this change in perspective is stark. I used to enjoy classic films such as those featuring Fred Astaire and Bing Crosby, but as I grew older, I noticed how racist and sexist their attitudes could be. While I do not believe that older films should be banished or destroyed, their inherent prejudices have diminished my enjoyment of them and have hindered my ability to recommend them to others. This experience is not unique; many people find themselves in a similar state, where they can no longer ignore the political and social elements of older works of art.

Why People Target Art with Anger

The intolerance of the modern era often extends to art, which can be an easy target for individuals venting their frustrations. Art does not have a defense mechanism, and its creators are subject to the whims of the marketplace and subsequent criticism. This cycle of judgment can be seen in the tearing down of statues and the banning of movies that are nevertheless praised by critics. These artistic works, such as the iconic 'Gone with the Wind,' are subjected to scrutiny that distorts their historical significance.

Lack of Emotional Maturity and Curiosity

One of the underlying reasons for the sensitivity to political correctness in older movies is the emotional immaturity of younger viewers. They may not have the emotional maturity or the intellectual curiosity to understand and appreciate the context of the era in which these films were made. For instance, watching movies from the 1930s to 1950s, they often fail to understand why roles were not gender-neutral, why people smoked recklessly, or why seat belts did not exist. This lack of context can lead to feelings of frustration and bewilderment.

Failure to Teach History

A significant factor contributing to this problem is the inadequate teaching and understanding of history. Many young people, particularly those under the age of 35, lack the historical knowledge necessary to comprehend why older films reflect the values and attitudes of the past. Without this historical context, they often disregard the films as outdated and morally incorrect. This approach to history undermines the value of art as a reflection of its time, rather than as a static and unchanging representation.

Appeal of Simplistic Purity Movements

Purity movements offer a simplified solution to complex issues. They promise emotional strength and clarity, which can be very appealing to those seeking quick fixes. However, the reality of these movements is often far from ideal. Once people become convinced of the righteous cause, it can be challenging to see beyond their assumptions. The allure of these movements lies in their straightforwardness and the promise of a clearer path.

Historical context is crucial for understanding and appreciating art from past eras. Only by recognizing the limitations of our current perspectives can we begin to engage with older films in a more nuanced and respectful manner. Education and empathy are key to navigating the complexities of art that reflect a bygone era.