The Reality and Myth of Cross Necklaces Among American Soldiers in Vietnam

It's a common misconception that cross necklaces were widely worn by American soldiers during the Vietnam War, as depicted in popular media like movies. This notion, while it captures the imagination, is not necessarily a reflection of the reality on the ground. In this article, we explore the truth behind the prevalence of cross necklaces among military personnel, drawing from historical accounts and personal experiences.

Personal Choice and Hollywood Creation

Wearing a cross necklace is indeed a personal choice that reflects one's faith and beliefs. It is true that some Vietnam veterans, including those depicted in films such as Platoon, wore cross necklaces. However, one must not assume that all veterans, or even a significant portion of them, wore such symbols. Absence of a cross necklace does not equate to a lack of faith. The movie Platoon, while a powerful and influential depiction of the war, is rooted in Hollywood's creative license rather than absolute historical accuracy.

Black Soldiers and Shoelace Crosses

There is an interesting historical anecdote about the 25th Infantry Division, which comprised a significant number of African American soldiers. During the Vietnam War, at least as of 1970, soldiers in this division would use shoelaces to braid into necklaces and bracelets to symbolize their bond as part of the Black Brotherhood. This practice was a way for soldiers to express their unity and resilience in the face of adversity.

Meanwhile, white soldiers often had rawhide strips or metallic chains around their necks, adorned with crosses, peace symbols, or items holding personal significance. These symbols held different meanings and served various purposes, reflecting the diversity of the American military experience.

The Aftermath and the Absence of Symbols

Upon returning to stateside bases after the war, the prevalence of these symbols diminished. The transition from the combat environment to a more routine life often meant that soldiers no longer wore these items with the same frequency. This does not negate the significance of their presence during the war but highlights the changes soldiers underwent after returning home.

Personal recollections vary. While some individuals might remember seeing these symbols, others may have a more limited or partial recollection. The passage of time and the diverse experiences of soldiers contribute to varied accounts of the wartime environment.

War and Media: Myth and Reality

War, in its essence, is a deeply complex and terrifying reality. Hollywood's portrayal of war for entertainment purposes often embellishes and simplifies this reality, introducing what is sometimes referred to as "BS" to make the narratives more engaging. It's important to approach depictions of war in media with a critical eye and recognize that films and other forms of entertainment are crafted to entertain, not necessarily to provide a factual account.

Conclusion

The wear of cross necklaces among American soldiers during the Vietnam War was indeed a personal and diverse matter. While some symbols carried significant meaning and historical context, others were mere reflections of individual or unit-specific practices. Understanding the complexity of these symbols and their significance requires delving into the personal and historical context, rather than accepting media portrayals as the sole truth.