Speeding Tickets and the Fundamental Flaws in Traffic Enforcement

Driving has become a far more frustrating experience due to an outdated and biased traffic enforcement system. Over the past three decades, as a seasoned driver, I have accumulated three speeding tickets, and each encounter involved no infraction of road safety rules. Conditions were perfect, with no visibility issues, on a straight section of road, and no nearby vehicles or pedestrians. However, the enforcement rules are clearly flawed, and the system needs urgent reform to protect all drivers and ensure fairness.

The Enforced Speed Limits and Traffic Management

Throughout California, the actual speed limits enforced are roughly 20 mph higher than the posted limits on freeways. This presents significant challenges for drivers, as obeying the actual limits could result in rear-end collisions. Traffic management and prediction software, including those used by city planners and navigation apps like Google Maps, rely on the assumption that everyone is speeding. Consequently, this systemic issue affects traffic flow and infrastructure planning.

Furthermore, the unpredictability of who gets ticketed highlights the issue. Law enforcement often disproportionately targets certain demographics, such as driving a worn-out car or belonging to a specific ethnicity. This practice not only undermines public trust but also complicates the debate over fair traffic enforcement. The current system penalizes individuals for actions that are deemed safe, while allowing others to break the law without consequence.

The Need for Reasonable Traffic Laws

The existing traffic laws must incorporate a principle of reasonableness. Traffic regulations should be applied in a way that balances safety with common sense. For instance, driving over a double yellow line to provide additional space to a cyclist is a practice some drivers consider reasonable. Despite being technically illegal, such actions increase road safety for all.

Additionally, the implementation of technology and video surveillance can provide transparency and accountability. Drivers should have access to the footage from traffic stops, allowing them to present a comprehensive argument about the intent behind their actions. This would shift the focus of law enforcement away from arbitrary ticketing and towards more significant safety concerns.

Conclusion

It is time for a fundamental overhaul of our traffic enforcement system to ensure fairness and reasonableness. By addressing the root causes and implementing transparent policies, we can create a safer and more equitable driving environment for all. The potential benefits of such reforms extend beyond individual drivers to positively impact traffic flow, public trust in law enforcement, and overall safety on our roads.