Monster by Walter Dean Myers: An Analysis of Steve’s Perspective on the Documentary

The book Monster by Walter Dean Myers delves into the complex and often misunderstood world of a young man named Steve, whose life takes a dramatic turn after he and his friend are accused of murder. Monster is a compelling exploration of how a person's actions and perceptions are intertwined, particularly in the face of intense scrutiny. One crucial aspect of the narrative is Steve's perspective on the documentary that is made about him, titled 'Monster.' In this essay, we will delve into why Steve decided to call his movie 'Monster' and analyze the deep psychological and moral implications of his decision.

Understanding Steve's Perspective

Steve is a complex character whose life becomes the subject of intense public and legal scrutiny. He faces the label of a "monster" not by choice, but by the societal and journalistic portrayal of him and his actions. The term 'monster' has been widely used to describe him, and this label has seeped into his psyche, making it a part of his identity.

Steve understands that he is perceived as a 'monster,' but he strongly disagrees with this characterization. He believes that he might have made poor choices and could be facing legal consequences for his actions, such as robbery, but he vehemently asserts that he is not responsible for murder. He feels the injustice in being called a 'monster' because he doesn't see himself as one.

The Decision to Call His Movie 'Monster'

Steve's decision to have the documentary name 'Monster' stems from a combination of factors. Firstly, he acknowledges the power of labels and how they can shape public perception. By title, he is challenging the societal narrative that has pegged him as a 'monster.' It is also a way for him to reclaim his identity from those who have tried to violently dehumanize him.

The documentary forces Steve to confront his actions and the reactions of others. It is a mirror held up to him, reflecting a harsh reality where the term 'monster' is used to describe someone who has made severe legal and ethical mistakes. Steve, however, feels that this label is unjust and distorts the truth. By accepting and using the term in the title, he is forcing the viewer to re-evaluate the construction of the term 'monster' and the assumptions often made about those accused of serious crimes.

Steve’s Stand Against the Label

Steve's personal stance against being labeled a 'monster' is rooted in his sense of justice and human dignity. He believes that the actions of a few should not define him or others like him. He views himself as a primarily hangout with the wrong crowd and someone who might be guilty of robbery but definitely not of murder. This distinction is significant in shaping how he sees himself and how he wants the world to perceive him.

Steve argues his innocence and the unjust nature of the public's and media's portrayal of him. He feels the need to challenge this narrative, not just for himself but for those who may find themselves in similar situations. By using 'Monster' in the title, Steve is inviting a conversation about the consequences of such harsh labels and the need for nuance and context in the justice system.

Conclusion: A Call for Human Understanding

Walter Dean Myers' Monster is a poignant reminder of the importance of human understanding and the complexity of human behavior. Steve's decision to have the documentary named 'Monster' is a powerful statement against the labeling of individuals without full context or understanding. It is a call for deeper introspection and the acknowledgment that people are more than the worst thing they might have done.

The story of Steve challenges readers to question the narratives they accept as truth and to recognize the humanity in those labeled as 'monsters.' It serves as a reminder that all individuals have the capacity for change and that society should strive to understand rather than judge.

Keywords

Monster, Walter Dean Myers, Steve, Documentary, Character Analysis