Improving Die Hard: Can We Make the Classic Christmas Movie Better?

Die Hard (1988) is one of the most beloved Christmas movies of all time, with its thrilling action sequences and iconic characters. However, even such a classic has room for improvements. In this article, we will explore some of the key changes that could elevate Die Hard and make it even more impactful for modern audiences.

Deputy Police Chief Dwayne T. Robinson: A Case for Reconsideration

Film critic Roger Ebert criticized Die Hard for a particular character, Deputy Police Chief Dwayne T. Robinson, describing him as a forgettable and wildly over-the-top figure who only served to state the obvious in an exaggerated manner. For example, his lines such as:

This is Deputy Chief of Police Dwayne T. Robinson and I am in charge of this situation.

clearly demonstrate his narrative redundancy. A more believable and nuanced portrayal of a character with authority could have added depth and credibility to the film.

Drop the FBI Subplot: Simplifying the Story

The FBI subplot in Die Hard is often considered one of the weakest elements of the film. It seems redundant given the terrorists’ threat, as a couple of gunfire in the transformer would have had the same effect. Simplifying the storyline could have made the main characters John McClane, Holly Gennaro, and Hans Gruber more central to the narrative, strengthening the impact and continuity of the plot.

Boosting Diversity and Inclusion

Die Hard was criticized for its lack of diversity, with notable examples being the minor roles given to minority characters. Argyle, for instance, was included purely for comedic relief, while Al appeared as the token "magical Negro." Even the Asian characters took on stereotypical roles, such as Takagi and Theo, the computer wiz of the terrorists.

By adding more minorities in significant roles, the film could have better represented the diverse communities of Los Angeles. For instance, introducing a Latino character into a major role would have added authenticity and depth to the story. This would not only enhance the film but also align with the modern sensibilities that promote inclusion and representation.

Increasing the Separation Between John and Holly

John and Holly's relationship was one of the emotional core of the story. However, the six-month separation felt too short and lacked the poignancy it could have had. By extending the separation to a year or even two, the audience would have more time to empathize with their situation and feel the emotional pain and longing that would naturally arise from such a long absence.

Revealing the Inside Man/Woman

The revelation of an inside man or woman could have added layers to the plot. It is unclear how the terrorists knew the location and the security codes of the building, which necessitated the involvement of an insider. Ellis Hart Bochner, a character who appears in the film, would have been the perfect candidate for this role. Not only would it add a sense of tension and betrayal, but it would also provide viewers with a clearer understanding of the terrorists' planning and actions.

Improvving the Escape Plan of the Terrorists

The escape plan executed by the terrorists was quite simplistic. Using an ambulance as a getaway vehicle or trying to escape through the sewer system would have required more cunning and creativity. For instance, planting a bomb in a trusted ally or creating a diversion that would allow them to safely leave the building undetected would have made the film more thrilling and suspenseful.

Conclusion

While Die Hard is a timeless classic, there are several areas where the film could have stood improvement. By addressing the issues of excessive plot elements, enhancing diversity, and deepening relationships, the movie could have achieved a more balanced narrative and stronger emotional resonance. These changes would not only make the film more realistic and engaging but also align it better with current sensibilities and audience expectations.