Exemption from Movie Classification: Understanding the Criteria

When discussing movie classification, many people immediately think of the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) ratings. However, there is more than just the familiar G, PG, PG-13, R, and NC-17 categories that govern movie content. In this article, we will explore the criteria that can make a movie exempt from the usual classification standards. We will also shed light on the potential implications of an unrated film.

Understanding the MPAA Rating System

The MPAA rating system was created in 1968 to provide parents with more information about the suitability of films for their children. It is a voluntary system, and while many studios and distributors use it, there is no legal requirement to do so. This means that there is a possibility for movies to be exempt from the traditional classification system.

The Unrated Orphan System

Unrated movies, also known as the "Orphan" system, are films that do not receive an MPAA rating. This doesn't mean they are automatically endorsed or promoted; rather, it indicates that the studio chose not to submit the film for classification. This decision can be made for various reasons, ranging from artistic integrity to avoiding potential box office risks.

What Makes a Movie Exempt?

Several factors can contribute to a movie's exemption from the usual classification criteria:

Artistic Integrity: Some filmmakers opt to submit their work to a festival or art house theater instead of submitting for the standard MPAA rating. These films often seek to bypass the more rigid categories, believing that their content should be viewed on a case-by-case basis by the audience. Low Budget and Niche Audiences: Films with smaller budgets and more specialized or niche audiences may choose not to pursue an official rating. These movies often rely on word-of-mouth, online reviews, and specific theatrical releases to find their audience. Cultural Sensitivity: Some filmmakers might feel that an official rating could be overly restrictive or categorize their film inappropriately. For example, a film dealing with sensitive political topics might be exempt if the filmmakers feel that a rating would not fully represent the film's message. Experimentation and Innovation: Some filmmakers intentionally create content that defies categorization. This type of film might be intentionally left unrated to challenge traditional boundaries and let the viewers decide for themselves.

Implications of an Unrated Film

While an unrated film can offer a sense of freedom and experimentation, it also comes with its own set of challenges:

Marketing and Box Office: Unrated films often face difficulties in attracting a traditional movie audience. Without the security of a formal rating, they may struggle to secure wider distribution and box office attention. Public Perception: Some viewers might be deterred by an unrated label, associating it with controversy or inappropriateness. However, others might view it as a sign of artistic courage and be more inclined to seek out the film. Regulatory and Legal Concerns: While unrated films are not necessarily illegal, they may face challenges in certain jurisdictions. For example, in some countries, certain titles might be subject to age restrictions regardless of the classification.

Examples of Exempted Movies

There are several notable films that have chosen to remain unrated or exempt from the usual classification system:

American Psycho (2000): Directed by Mary Harron and starring Christian Bale, this film received a prototype rating of “Parents Strongly Cautioned” in 1999. Due to its controversial content, the studio ultimately decided to release it without an official rating, relying instead on its release to art house venues. The Homlish Picture Show (2012): This experimental film, directed by Justin Long, was released without an MPAA rating. The film is described as a synesthetic, immersive tribute to director Michael Mann and tackles themes of violence and sexuality. The decision to go unrated was part of its artistic vision. Spring Breakers (2012): Directed by Harmony Korine, this film received an NC-17 rating, which the stars and filmmakers contested. The movie was ultimately released unrated, with distributors relying on marketing to target a specific niche audience.

Conclusion

Exempting a movie from the standard classification criteria is a complex decision that depends on a wide range of factors. While it offers the freedom to pursue a unique vision, it also comes with risks and challenges. Understanding the criteria and implications is crucial for both filmmakers and audiences. Whether a film chooses to break the rules or follow them, the decision ultimately shapes the way it is perceived and received by the public.