Diplomatic Table Manners: A Look into Racial Inequality and Evolution

In the context of diplomatic protocols and cross-cultural interactions, the dining table has historically mirrored the prevailing social norms of its time. From the late 1950s to the early 1970s, we can see stark contrasts in how diplomats of different races and nationalities were treated during official visits. This article explores these historical instances and the evolution of diplomatic practices that have brought about a more inclusive world.

From 1957 to 1964: A Key Period of Change

One significant incident occurred in 1957 when the minister of finance of a black country was denied entry into a restaurant in Delaware because of his race. This stark example of racial discrimination was a vivid reflection of the segregation policies still prevalent in the United States at the time. President Eisenhower eventually apologized for this egregious misconduct, acknowledging the issue to the public.

Following this, diplomatic protocols were put under scrutiny, with expectations that American officials would take African diplomats out to eat. However, it is reasonable to predict that the choice of restaurant and the company of the American colleagues would have been carefully considered. After all, as state department operatives noted, 'they whiffed more than a few pitches over the centuries but are getting better with age'. The challenge was to ensure that these events complied with the evolving standards of diplomatic conduct, respect, and friendship.

The Crossing Threshold: Integration in 1970

By 1970, the landscape had changed significantly. The passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 marked a pivotal moment in American history. The legislation, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, legally ended Jim Crow laws, which had institutionalized racial segregation in the South. This legal change had profound implications for how African diplomats were received and treated during their official visits.

Even as segregation became illegal, the social and cultural barriers were still present. The warmth with which African diplomats were greeted was still an open question. However, as representatives of the new African republics, they brought with them a level of Western university education and possibly military or NASA escorts. These factors likely contributed to a more welcoming and secure environment for them during their visits.

Evolving Diplomatic Protocols in Practice

The formal and informal protocols followed by diplomats during their visits serve as a microcosm of broader societal changes. In the case of dining with local officials in the South, even after the legal segregation ended, the restaurant would have been notified in advance of the visit, and it was probable that they would be escorted to ensure proper treatment. Post-1964, the US government was more vigilant in ensuring that African diplomats received appropriate and dignified treatment.

It is evident that with the right preparation and communication, even in the face of lingering social norms, diplomats could overcome barriers and set an example of respect and equality. The journey from the 1950s to the 1970s demonstrates how diplomatic practices can evolve to address pressing social and ethical issues.

Today, as we continue to navigate the complexities of international relations, the lessons from these episodes in history remind us of the importance of inclusivity, education, and the unwavering commitment to upholding human rights and dignity in all diplomatic engagements.

Keywords: Diplomatic Dining, Racial Segregation, Civil Rights Act, 1970 Southern Cuisine, Diplomatic Hospitality