Capitol Officer Harry Dunn: Is He Telling the Truth about the MAGA Assault?

In the aftermath of the January 6th Capitol Riot, the video evidence has brought to light several instances where numerous Capitol Police officers lied about the events that unfolded. This article aims to explore the credibility of Capitol Officer Harry Dunn's statements and the broader implications of these allegations.

Video Evidence against the Police Officers

With all the footage now released, it is evident that the Oath Keepers—the four men currently serving prison sentences—were present to support the police when the situation deteriorated. This revelation suggests that their initial statements about their role in the riots may have been misleading. Therefore, their current sentences should be reconsidered, and new hearings should be held for each individual. The prosecution may intentionally delay these processes, and mainstream media may suppress the story. In this scenario, the Oath Keepers may end up accepting plea deals on lesser charges due to financial constraints and the overwhelming resources of government prosecutors. This acceptance of plea deals would likely reinforce the media's narrative that these men are criminals, despite the new evidence.

The Credibility of Officer Harry Dunn

Harry Dunn, a Capitol Police officer, claims to have been present during the assault by President Trump's supporters. Despite some doubts expressed in online forums, a close look at the evidence suggests that Dunn is indeed telling the truth.

Here are several reasons why Hunger says he is not lying:

Belief in the Truth: Why would Dunn, a public servant, lie about such a serious event? Remember, several individuals lost their lives that day, and the officers were sworn to uphold the law under oath.

Career Implications: Dunn would face serious repercussions if he was proven to be lying, including charges of perjury or lying to Congress. This risk underscores his commitment to the truth.

Moral Integrity: Dunn's account, backed by video footage, matches the first-hand experiences of those who were present during the riots. His testimony is a critical component in understanding the events of that day.

Moreover, if Dunn had reservations about the truth of his statements, he would have allowed another officer to testify instead of making a false report.

Public Perception and the Role of Unreliable Sources

Unfortunately, some individuals have been misled by pro-Trump supporters and QAnon adherents, who ironically hold the title of "lawmakers." These supporters often spread misinformation that clouds the truth. It is crucial for the public to rely on verifiable sources and evidence when forming opinions on such significant events.

Overall, the evidence suggests that Harry Dunn and other Capitol Police officers are indeed telling the truth about their involvement in the MAGA assault. The public should not be swayed by unreliable sources and should instead trust in the verifiable facts and video evidence available.